M38 A1s, National Museum of Military Vehicles.
Last edition:
The M151 "Mutt" entered service in 1959 and carried on into the 1990s. It had fantastic off road capabilities, and was also fantastically dangerous, given its independent wheel suspension system.
The last Jeep to see general use in the U.S. military, it was replaced by HumVeh's, although speciality vehicles, and even modern commercial Jeeps, continue to see some use. In these examples, the radio mount for a period radio is displayed.
Sarah Sundin's excellent blog on daily events in World War Two, whose feed updates are no longer working, notes this item:
Two gallons per week.
Could you get by on two gallons per week? Most days I drive a 1/4 ton Utility Truck, which is better known as a Jeep, and while it's small, it gets terrible mileage. I know that I use more than two gallons per week, but I would if I was driving my fuel efficient diesel truck as well. If I was limited to two gallons per week, I'd have to make major life changes.
Should I be pondering this as Congress, through the neglect of Ukraine, pushes us ever closer to a war with Russia, should she invade the Balkans?
During World War Two I know that my grandfather had a different class of ration ticket as his vehicle was used for business. His car was a "business coupe", which is about all I know about it.
I had a 1954 Chevrolet at one time, and it got really good mileage. Interestingly, a 1973 Mercury Comet, with a really powerful V8 engine we had, also did. According to one site about older cars, the business couple should be something like this:
My '38 gets around 17-18 MPG @ 50 MPH. It drops to around 12-14 @ 60. She just doesn't like being pushed that hard.
My 54, and the 73, got much better mileage than that.
Whatever mileage the business coupé got, my father sort of brushed gasoline rationing off when I asked him about it, due to the other category of ticket. I don't know what that really meant, however.
Of course, for most long travel of any kind, people took the train. Something that we might want to consider as potentially being something that may very well return. High speed rail, for that matter, may be coming to Wyoming.
Last prior edition:
Suzuki's idea of a Jeep, the Samurai was a little Jeep like vehicle that frankly recalls the Bantam that preceded the Willys, too light and too small.
I ran across this one just the other day. You don't see too many anymore, but for those who have them, and haven't rolled them, well, they're probably handy.
July 22, 2023
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles lost its renewed legal battle seeking to keep Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. from selling the redesigned Roxor off-road vehicle in the US.
The lawsuit claimed the designed trespass on protected elements of the Jeep. I don't know the details of the suit, but the Roxor is pretty clearly a Jeep externally, and more particularly the old CJ-5.
Lex Anteinternet: SUVs before SUVs:
A 1962 Dodge Power Giant Carryall. Not mine, I saw it for sale the other day while driving through town. It appears in nice shape, and still features bias ply tires. This is a D100 Carryall, which means its rated at 1/2 ton, although it has a two speed rear axle. Of course, I don't know anything about it or what is, or isn't original. It looks pretty original, however.
Anyhow, it's interesting how SUVs are supposed to be a modern concept, with the Chevrolet Suburban supposedly sort of ushering them in. But Suburban's themselves go way back, and before them were vehicles like this Dodge Carryall. Carryalls, in fact, go all the way back to World War Two.
Of course, these aren't easy to drive. It has a manual transmission and armstrong steering. And, of course, conventional hydraulic brakes. Not something a soccer mom, or dad, would probably drive. Still, it's interesting to note how far back the concept of a full sized 4x4, built on a truck frame, goes. About as far back as 4x4 trucks themselves.
Jeep
I've owned Jeeps twice.
My first car, a 1958 M38A1 Army Jeep. In the words of Iris Dement, "it turned over once, but never went far."*My very first vehicle was a Jeep. I bought it for $500 with money I had earned from a summer job. I was 15 at the time, and not old enough to actually drive, but I still had it when I turned 16.The engine was a mess, in need of rebuilding or replacement, and as you can see, the prior owner had hit a tree with it. As the engine was so worn out, it burned nearly as much oil as gasoline, and I sold it when I was 16 and bought a Ford F100 to replace it.My second Jeep was a 1946 CJ2A, the very first model of civilian Jeep. I kept it for awhile, but ultimately when my son was small, I sold it too. The CJ2A, particularly ones made in the first couple of years of production, was nearly unchanged from the World War Two Army 1/4 ton truck that gave rise to the species, and indeed, the model I had, had some parts commonality otherwise unique to the Army Jeeps of the Second World War.Depiction of Jeep in use on Guadalcanal, bringing in a KIA.Jeeps got their start in that role, as a military vehicle, a 1/4 ton truck, entering service just prior to World War Two. Bantam, a now extinct motor vehicle manufacturer, gets a lot of credit for the basic design, and indeed the Bantam Jeep did enter U.S. and British service.Bantam Jeep being serviced by Army mechanic. The Bantam was actually lighter than the Willys Jeep.But it was Willys, with larger manufacturing capacity, that really gets credit for the design. It was their design that became the Jeep, although Ford made a huge number of Jeeps during the Second World War as well.Coast Guard patrol with Jeep. The Coast Guard also had mounted patrols during the Second World War, acquiring horses and tack from the Army.American and Australian troops with Jeep serving as a field ambulance.Jeeps became synonymous with U.S. troops during World War Two. Indeed, there's a story, probably just a fable, of a French sentry shooting a party of Germans who tried to pass themselves off as Americans, simply because the sentry knew that a walking party of men could not be Americans, they "came in Jeeps." A story, probably, but one that reflected how common Jeeps were and how much they were admired by U.S. forces at the time. It's commonly claimed by some that Jeeps replaced the horse in the U.S. Army, but that's only slightly true, and only in a very limited sense. It might be more accurate to say that the Jeep replaced the mule and the horse in a limited role, but it was really the American 6x6 truck that did the heavy lifting of the war, and which was truly a revolutionary weapon.None the less, the fame of the Jeep was won, and after the war Jeeps went right into civilian production. For a time, Willys was confused over what the market would be for the little (uncomfortable) car, and marketed to farmers and rural workers, who never really saw the utility of the vehicle over other options. Indeed, for farmers and ranchers who needed a 4x4, it was really the Dodge Power Wagon that took off. The market for Jeeps was with civilian outdoorsmen, who rapidly adopted it in spite of the fact that it's very small, quite uncomfortable, and actually, in its original form, a very dangerous vehicle prone to rolling. Still, the light truck's 4x4 utility allowed sportsmen to go places all year around that earlier civilian cars and trucks simply did not. The back country, and certain seasons of the year, were suddenly opened up to them. For that reason, Jeeps were an integral part of the Revolution In Rural Transportation we've otherwise written about. You can't really keep a horse and a pack mule in your backyard in town, but you can keep a Jeep out on the driveway.Not surprisingly, Willys (and its successor in the line, Kaiser) soon had a lot of competition in the field. The British entered it nearly immediately with the Land Rover, a light 4x4 designed for the British army originally that's gone on to have a cult following, in spite of being expensive and, at least early on, prone to the faults of British vehicles. Nissan entered the field with the Nissan Patrol, a vehicle featuring the British boxiness but already demonstrating the fine traits that Japanese vehicles would come to be known for. Toyota entered the field with its legendary Land Cruiser, the stretched version of which I once owned one of, and which was an absolutely great 4x4. Indeed, their smaller Jeep sized vehicle, in my opinion, was the best in this vehicle class. Ford even entered the field with the original Bronco. Over time, even Suzuki would introduce its diminutive Samurai.So, what's happened here to this class of vehicles anyway?Recently, for reason that are hard to discern, I decided to start looking once again for a vehicle in this class. I know their defects. They are unstable compared to trucks, and they don't carry much either. But there is something about them. Last time I looked around there were a lot of options, and costs were reasonable for a used one. Well, not anymore.I don't know if its the urbanized SUV that's taken over everything. But whereas once a fellow looking for a Jeep like vehicle could look for Jeeps, Land Cruisers, Land Rovers, Samurais, Broncos and International Scouts, now you are down to Jeeps, the Toyota FJ Cruiser or the soon to be extinct Land Rover Defender. The Defender is insanely expensive, but the Jeep and Cruiser sure aren't cheap. Even used vehicles in this class now command a crazy price. I'm actually amazed I see so many around, given that most people don't use them for what they are designed for, and they're so darned expensive.
Lex Anteinternet: Subsidiarity Economics. The times more or less loc...:May 13, 2023
Ford Motors will no longer put AM radio in its vehicles. Any of them. Many other manufacturers are pulling theirs from electric vehicles.